“Circle Back” Appears on Influential College Quotes That Should Be Banned
There should be no more “going back” to an earlier topic in the New Year, according to Lake Superior State University’s influential annual bad words list.
The internship, a modern alternative to ‘I’ll get back to you on this,’ has been used frequently by White House press secretary Jen Psaki over the past year, as she repeatedly dodged questions. journalists.
Her overuse of the term led to several conservative memes and even a rap song compiling all of the times she said the phrase.
But the term “treats the symposium like an ice rink, as if we need to revert to an earlier topic,” University of Michigan researchers said in their most recent listing.
And one grammarian says it’s “the most overused phrase in business, government, or other organizations since” synergy, “which the university also banned in 2002.
White House press secretary Jen Psaki has been mocked for her excessive use of the term ‘back in circle’ during her press conferences. This term is now on Lake Superior State University’s annual forbidden words list.
Many other words on this year’s list were also banned for misuse, including “Wait, what” and “No worries”.
“Say what you think and think what you say,” LSSU President Rodney S. Hanley said in a statement. “I can’t get any easier or harder than that.
“Each year, the authors strive to suggest words and terms to be banned, paying close attention to what humanity says and writes,” he added.
The Michigan-based college has published its list of banned words and phrases every year since 1976, receiving thousands of entries each time. He publishes his new list every year on New Years Eve to “start the New Year off right, uh, tongue.”
Over the past year, people have submitted more than 1,250 suggestions for consideration, nominations not only from the United States, but also from Norway, Belgium, England, Scotland, Australia and the United States. Canada.
“Most people speak through informal speeches,” said Peter Szatmary, executive director of marketing and communications at LSSU. “This is the distinction the nominators made from afar, and our judges agreed with them.”
Although terms related to the COVID pandemic dominated last year’s list, LSSU officials say this year’s programming is more conversational, with just three words on this year’s list applying to the coronavirus.
“A takeaway from all of this about the act and art of disclosing something is that the more things change, the more things stay the same,” Szatmary suggested. “At the very least, it’s complicated.
The Michigan-based college has published its banned word list every year since 1976, receiving thousands of entries each time
The school received more than 1,250 words for its list of banned this year from countries including the United States, Norway, Belgium, England, Scotland, Australia and Canada
Topping this year’s list of banned words was the phrase “Wait, what”, often used on social media, which those who named the term say is a “failed response to a statement to express astonishment, incomprehension or disbelief “.
Critics say he’s overworked.
The term “No worries” came in second, as it was used as an incorrect and often passive-aggressive substitute for “You’re welcome”. List contributors also said the term may be callous. “If I’m not worried I don’t want someone telling me not to worry,” they wrote. “If I’m upset, I want to discuss being upset. “
Other words on this year’s list related to current events, including the hackneyed phrase “the new normal” to describe living a pandemic, and “You’re on the mute,” with one contributor writing: “We are in two years working and visiting remotely. It’s time for everyone to find out where the mute button is.
‘Supply chain’ was also on this year’s list, which dominated the news cycle at year’s end as COVID-related staff shortages resulted in a backlog of supplies and merchandise. .
But as one proponent wrote, “Supply chain issues have become the scapegoat for everything that doesn’t happen or doesn’t happen on time and every shortage.”
Lake Superior State University 2022 Banned Words List
- ‘Wait what? ‘ – Most often found in text or on social media, this ubiquitous imperative question is a “failed response to a statement to express astonishment, misunderstanding or disbelief,” explained one wordsmith. “I hate it,” added another, as the command request is an inaccurate method of conveying uncertainty or surprise to the speaker. “I don’t want to wait either,” continued the passionate second sponsor.
- ‘No problem’ – Named by writers nationwide for abuse and abuse, this phrase falsely replaces “You’re welcome” when someone says “Thank you.” Another mess concerns insensitivity. “If I’m not worried, I don’t want someone telling me not to worry,” one contributor explained. “If I’m upset, I want to discuss being upset. Despite its meaninglessness, the term is recommended to email senders by Google Assistant.
- ‘At the end of the day’ – More than twenty years after the initial ban of this sentence in 1999, the day is still not over for this misused, overused and useless expression. “A lot of times things don’t end at the end of the day – or even the ramifications of whatever happens,” one sage observed. Others view “day” as an imprecise measure. Today? Time present? Banishment in 1999: Overused synopsis of a conversation or debate, often by politicians and pundits.
- ‘That being said’ – The proponents cited this sentence as verbal filler, redundant justification and pompous posture. For example, “however” or “but” – even “that said” – does the job as a transition instead of verbosity. “Go ahead and say what you want already!” Demanded a participant. That being said, its usefulness is certainly in doubt. As the philosopher one commentator: “In the end, if you will, it already has been.
- ‘Ask a friend’ – Abuse and abuse by deception – because the friend is a trick. This cutesy phrase, often deployed in social media posts in a half-hearted attempt to deter self-identification, isn’t fooling anyone. Paraphrasing a sage, “Formerly used to avoid embarrassment, as in ‘Do you know a good proctologist? I ask a friend. Sometimes an occasional sitcom joke. Now a hackneyed label that has absolutely nothing to do with its antecedent. ‘
- ‘Return circle ‘ – Treat the conference like an ice rink, as if we had to go back to our previous location to go back to an earlier topic. Let’s go back to find out why ban this jargon. It’s a conversation, not the Winter Olympics. According to one grammarian, “the most overused phrase in business, government or any other organization since ‘synergy’ – which we banned in 2002 as elusive and crass terminology of smart pants.
- ‘Deep dive’ – “The only time to dive into something is when entering a body of water, without going deeper into a particular subject or book,” chided one petitioner. Another stated that the people who float the phrase are not near a pool, lake, ocean or sea; thus, rather than diving deep, they wade shallow. A publishing ace asked himself, “Do we need” deep? I mean, does anyone dive into the shallow end?
- “New normal” – Over-exploited tote for the ways COVID-19 affects humanity – and finalist in ban last year for similar reasons. “Those who claim the old days, around 2019, are using this to unwittingly signal that they haven’t understood what ‘normal’ means,” one monitor explained. “After a few years is all of this really” new? ‘, speculated another. Banned in 2012 for recklessness, defeatism and apathy resulting from the company’s missteps.
- “You are muted” – People have gone from face-to-face exchanges to virtual meetings to follow COVID-19’s social distancing protocol, and the involuntary deafening silence is occurring on both sides of the camera. Abuse and uselessness, therefore, due to incompetence. One insightful presenter summed up the problem: “We’re two years away from working and visiting remotely. It’s time for everyone to find out where the mute button is. Or as a summed up joker, “Hello? Hello?’
- ‘Supply Chain’ –Wordwatchers noticed the frequent and unfortunate appearance of this phrase towards the end of this year as the coronavirus persisted. “This is automatically included in the reports on consumer goods shortages or perceived shortages. In other words, a buzzword, ”concluded one analyst. “Supply chain issues have become the scapegoat for everything that doesn’t or doesn’t happen on time and every shortage,” remarked another. The negative result: ad nauseam overuse.